Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Evidence Act 1872 › Under Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, an …
Under Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, an **admission** is best described as:
A{'text': 'A statement (oral, documentary, or contained in electronic form) which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, made by certain persons in certain circumstances', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'A confession of guilt made before a Magistrate by an accused person after recording the relevant statutory warnings prescribed under Section 164 of the Code', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'A pleading filed in any civil suit by any party admitting the entire claim of the opposite party in unequivocal and unambiguous terms in writing', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'A communication made privately by a husband to his wife during the subsistence of the marriage which is protected from disclosure under Section 122 of the Act', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. {'text': 'A statement (oral, documentary, or contained in electronic form) which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, made by certain persons in certain circumstances', 'label': 'A'}
1. Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act defines "admission" as a **statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact**.
2. The statement must be made by **certain persons** (Sections 18-20) and under **certain circumstances**.
3. Confession (option B) is a *species* of admission specific to criminal proceedings; not all admissions are confessions.
4. The lesson notes admissions need not be voluntary to be relevant; confessions must be voluntary.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 11 (Indian Evidence Act, 1872), pp. 251-272._
Related questions
Lesson 11 explains the difference between **confession and admission**. Which statement isAccording to the lesson, the distinction between **relevancy and admissibility** under theLesson 11 explains the distinction between **logical relevancy** and **legal relevancy**. Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act allows certain **statements by persons who cannot beLesson 11 lists **different kinds of estoppel** recognised in Indian law. Which set lists In *Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh*, (1930) 30 Cal. 530 PC, the Privy Council laid down aThe general rule of **estoppel** under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act is based on Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act distinguishes between **"may presume"**, **"shall pre