Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Evidence Act 1872 › Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act makes relev…
Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act makes relevant any fact which shows or constitutes a **motive** or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact. According to the lesson, motive is:
A{'text': 'Always identical with intention and required to be specifically proved in every criminal case before conviction can follow at all', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Relevant only in civil cases and entirely excluded as inadmissible in every criminal case under any provision of the Indian Evidence Act', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Irrelevant in every criminal case under the Act regardless of whether direct or circumstantial evidence is being relied upon by the prosecution', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Different from intention; the substantive law is rarely concerned with motive, but its existence may be relevant in every criminal case as evidence', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. {'text': 'Different from intention; the substantive law is rarely concerned with motive, but its existence may be relevant in every criminal case as evidence', 'label': 'D'}
1. Section 8 of the Act makes motive, preparation, and previous/subsequent conduct relevant.
2. Lesson 11 says: "Motive means which moves a person to act in a particular way. It is **different from intention**."
3. "The substantive law is rarely concerned with motive, but the existence of a motive, from the point of view of evidence, would be a relevant fact, in every criminal case."
4. Motive is a **psychological fact** and almost always proved by circumstantial evidence.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 11 (Indian Evidence Act, 1872), pp. 251-272._
Related questions
Lesson 11 explains the difference between **confession and admission**. Which statement isAccording to the lesson, the distinction between **relevancy and admissibility** under theLesson 11 explains the distinction between **logical relevancy** and **legal relevancy**. Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act allows certain **statements by persons who cannot beLesson 11 lists **different kinds of estoppel** recognised in Indian law. Which set lists In *Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh*, (1930) 30 Cal. 530 PC, the Privy Council laid down aThe general rule of **estoppel** under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act is based on Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act distinguishes between **"may presume"**, **"shall pre