Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Evidence Act 1872 › The doctrine of **res gestae** is codified in wh…
The doctrine of **res gestae** is codified in which section of the Indian Evidence Act, and what does it permit?
A{'text': 'Section 45, which makes relevant the opinions of experts upon a point of foreign law, science, art, identity of handwriting or finger impression', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Section 32, which makes relevant statements by persons who cannot be called as witnesses under any of the nine clauses set out in the section', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Section 6, which makes relevant facts that, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Section 115, which lays down the doctrine of estoppel and bars a person from denying a fact he has caused another to believe and to act upon', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. {'text': 'Section 6, which makes relevant facts that, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction', 'label': 'C'}
1. **Section 6** of the Indian Evidence Act codifies the **res gestae** rule.
2. The lesson states: "Acts or declarations accompanying the transaction or the facts in issue are treated as part of the res gestae and admitted as evidence."
3. The ground of admission is **spontaneity and immediacy** of the act or declaration.
4. Sections 32, 45 and 115 deal with dying declarations etc., expert opinion, and estoppel respectively — distinct doctrines.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 11 (Indian Evidence Act, 1872), pp. 251-272._
Related questions
Lesson 11 explains the difference between **confession and admission**. Which statement isAccording to the lesson, the distinction between **relevancy and admissibility** under theLesson 11 explains the distinction between **logical relevancy** and **legal relevancy**. Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act allows certain **statements by persons who cannot beLesson 11 lists **different kinds of estoppel** recognised in Indian law. Which set lists In *Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh*, (1930) 30 Cal. 530 PC, the Privy Council laid down aThe general rule of **estoppel** under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act is based on Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act distinguishes between **"may presume"**, **"shall pre