Practice free →
HomeCS ExecutivejurisprudenceIndian Evidence Act 1872 › According to the lesson, the standard of proof r…

According to the lesson, the standard of proof required in **civil cases** versus **criminal cases** is:

A{'text': 'Civil: beyond all reasonable doubt; Criminal: mere preponderance of probability sufficient for any decision under any provision of the Act', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Civil: mere preponderance of probability; Criminal: beyond all reasonable doubt amounting to moral certainty', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Civil and criminal: identical standard of beyond all reasonable doubt in every case under the Act regardless of nature of proceeding involved', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Civil and criminal: identical standard of mere preponderance of probability under the Act regardless of nature of proceeding involved', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. {'text': 'Civil: mere preponderance of probability; Criminal: beyond all reasonable doubt amounting to moral certainty', 'label': 'B'}
1. Lesson 11 contrasts the two standards expressly. 2. **Civil cases**: the principle of **mere preponderance of probability** is the sufficient basis of a decision. 3. **Criminal cases**: the higher standard of **beyond all reasonable doubt** applies; the persuasion of guilt must amount to moral certainty. 4. This rule is judge-made but firmly embedded in Section 3 and the structure of the Act. _Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 11 (Indian Evidence Act, 1872), pp. 251-272._
Solve this in the app — CS Executive practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions