Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Interpretation of Statutes › The 'statement of objects and reasons' attached …
The 'statement of objects and reasons' attached to a Bill, according to the ICSI material, may legitimately be referred to:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D.
1. Per the ICSI text, the statement of objects and reasons can be legitimately referred to for a correct appreciation of:
2. (1) **what was the law before the disputed Act was passed**, (2) **what was the mischief or defect for which the law had not provided**, (3) **what remedy the legislature has intended**, and (4) **the reasons for the statute**.
3. However, the statement may NOT be used to override the express words — Courts have only to inquire what the legislature has thought fit to enact.
4. Where extensive changes were made during the passage of the Bill, the objects of the changed provisions may not be the same as of the original Bill's clauses; undue importance should not be attached to the statement in such cases.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive — Lesson 3, 'Internal Aids — Schedules (closing on statement of objects and reasons)', p. 94._
Related questions
Why does the ICSI material insist that a statute be construed 'in its context' rather thanRegarding the use of 'Parliamentary History' as an external aid in India, the position is Strict construction is to be applied to certain classes of statutes, while liberal (benefiWhat is the role of dictionaries as an external aid to statutory interpretation, accordingThe Rule of Harmonious Construction directs that a statute be read as a whole to avoid conThe maxim *Contemporanea Expositio Est Optima Et Fortissima in Lege* is invoked in statutoWhat is the modern view on the use of 'marginal notes' appended to sections of an Indian sThe Mischief Rule from *Heydon's Case* may be applied only when certain conditions are met