Home › B.Tech Civil › civilengineering › Concrete Mix Design › Per §10.2, the two most important EMPIRICAL rela…
Per §10.2, the two most important EMPIRICAL relations on which medium-strength mix design rests are:
A{'text': 'Strength governed by cement type; durability by aggregate shape only', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Strength governed by w/c ratio; workability by water + fine aggregate content', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Cost governed by labour only; quality control irrelevant', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Strength tied to age only; workability tied to admixture only', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. {'text': 'Strength governed by w/c ratio; workability by water + fine aggregate content', 'label': 'B'}
1. §10.2 lists the two anchors: (i) compressive strength is governed by water-cement ratio, and (ii) for given aggregate characteristics workability is governed by water content and fine aggregate content.
2. Other factors (quality, batching, mixing, placing, compaction, curing) modify but do not replace these two empirical relations.
_Source: IGNOU ET-522 Block-3 Unit-10 Concrete Mix Design, §10.2, p. 6_
Related questions
Per §10.8 (Step 8), the correction applied to mix proportions when site aggregates are fouPer §10.10 (High Strength Concrete Mix), the addition of Condensed Silica Fume (CSF) at abPer §10.10 (High Strength Concrete Mix), the use of a SUPERPLASTICIZER allows the water coPer the worked illustrative example in §10.9 (M 20, 20 mm angular, 0.90 CF, good control, Per §10.8 (Step 9, Trial Mix), the calculated mix proportions are verified by casting at lPer Table 10.5 (durability in mix design), the MINIMUM cement content for REINFORCED concrPer §10.8 (Step 5, Table 10.9), the correction for using ROUNDED aggregate (instead of thePer §10.8 (Step 5, Table 10.9), if the actual compacting factor is 0.1 HIGHER than the ref