How has time dilation been experimentally confirmed?
AComparing an orbiting atomic clock with one on Earth
BBy weighing a clock before and after a plane flight
CBy photographing a clock at different distances
DBy measuring the color of light from a stationary clock
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Comparing an orbiting atomic clock with one on Earth
1. Time dilation predicts that a moving clock should record less elapsed time than a clock at rest.
2. This was tested by sending an atomic clock into orbit and comparing its recorded time with a clock that stayed on Earth.
3. GPS satellites also must be adjusted to compensate for this same effect to give accurate positioning.
4. Weighing a clock, photographing it, or checking its color are not how this effect was tested.
5. So the orbiting atomic clock comparison is correct.
_Source: OpenStax Physics (CC BY 4.0), Ch 10 "Special Relativity", section 10.2 Consequences of Special Relativity_
Keep practising Special Relativity
Browse all Special Relativity questions for Alberta Diploma Exams, or explore more Physics topics.
Related questions
Knock out the false light claimsIn the RHIC collider, gold ions are accelerated to about 99.7 percent of the speed of lighDeuterium has a binding energy of 3.56 x 10^-13 J. Using c = 3.00 x 10^8 m/s, what is its The nucleus of fluorine-18 has a mass defect of 2.44 x 10^-28 kg. Using c = 3.00 x 10^8 m/What is the rest energy, E0, of an object with a mass of 1.00 g? Use c = 3.00 x 10^8 m/s.A rod has a proper length of 100 m. An observer moving relative to the rod at 0.80c measurA spaceship has a proper length of 50 m. As it flies past Earth at 0.95c, what length woulWhat happens to relativistic momentum, p = gamma m u, as an object's speed u approaches th