In INDIAN COMPUTER NETWORK STATE (Microsoft Corp v Mr Yogesh Papat & Anr, 2005 PTC 245 (Del)), the Delhi High Court held that:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A.
1. Indian courts have repeatedly affirmed that unauthorised reproduction, sale and distribution of software constitutes COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT under Sections 51, 63 Copyright Act 1957.
2. Microsoft Corp v. Yogesh Papat (Delhi HC, 2005) awarded Rs 19 lakh in damages including exemplary damages.
3. Microsoft Corp v. K. Mayuri (Delhi HC, 2007) and several other 'John Doe' orders have addressed software piracy.
4. Section 65A Copyright Act (inserted 2012) criminalises circumvention of TPMs.
5. Section 14(b) gives software owners broader rights including commercial rental.
6. Hence option B is correct.
_Source: Patents Act 1970 / Copyright Act 1957 / Trade Marks Act 1999 — Microsoft Corp v Mr Yogesh Papat, 2005 PTC 245 (Del); Microsoft Corp v K. Mayuri & Anr, 2007 (35) PTC 415 (Del)_
Related questions
Section 31C Copyright Act 1957 (inserted 2012) is a STATUTORY LICENCE for COVER VERSIONS oSection 47 Trade Marks Act 1999 allows REMOVAL OF A TRADE MARK FROM REGISTER for NON-USE. Section 70 Copyright Act 1957 deals with DELIVERY OF INFRINGING COPIES to the copyright owSection 159 Trade Marks Act 1999 enables the Central Government to issue NOTIFICATION DESISection 47 Patents Act 1970 (CONDITIONS OF GRANT) allows USE for purposes of:Section 14(b) Copyright Act 1957 confers on the owner of copyright in a COMPUTER PROGRAMMESection 31D Copyright Act 1957 (inserted 2012) is a STATUTORY LICENCE for BROADCASTING of Section 25 Designs Act 2000 deals with PIRACY OF REGISTERED DESIGN. Any person who: