Practice free →
HomeCS ExecutivejurisprudenceIndian Penal Code 1860 › Which case did the Supreme Court rely on in *V.R…

Which case did the Supreme Court rely on in *V.R. Dalal v. Yugendra Naranji Thakkar*, 2008 (15) SCC 625, to hold that the **first ingredient of criminal breach of trust** is entrustment, and that absence of entrustment cannot constitute the offence?

A{'text': 'Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar establishing entrustment of stridhan property by the wife to the in-laws under matrimonial law', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'U. Dhar v. State of Jharkhand quashing the order of the magistrate on appeal between a principal and sub-contractor dispute', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Mohammad Ali v. State acquitting the accused under section 403 of the Code for absence of any proof of theft of wires', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'The very judgment in V.R. Dalal v. Yugendra Naranji Thakkar establishing entrustment as the foundational requirement', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. {'text': 'The very judgment in V.R. Dalal v. Yugendra Naranji Thakkar establishing entrustment as the foundational requirement', 'label': 'D'}
1. The lesson cites *V.R. Dalal v. Yugendra Naranji Thakkar*, 2008 (15) SCC 625, as the Supreme Court's own authority for the entrustment requirement under section 405. 2. The Court held: "the first ingredient of criminal breach of trust is entrustment and where it is missing, the same would not constitute a criminal breach of trust". 3. *Pratibha Rani* concerned stridhan; *Mohammad Ali* concerned section 403; *U. Dhar* concerned a civil/criminal remedy split. 4. The entrustment principle is the holding of *V.R. Dalal* itself. _Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 9 (Indian Penal Code, 1860), pp. 205-224._
Solve this in the app — CS Executive practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions