Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Penal Code 1860 › Under the proviso to **Section 120A IPC**, when …
Under the proviso to **Section 120A IPC**, when is an agreement to commit an act other than an offence treated as a criminal conspiracy?
A{'text': 'Only where some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties in pursuance of the agreement', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Where the agreement is made between three or more persons rather than two, with the third witnessing in good faith', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Where the agreement is recorded in writing by at least one of the conspirators and registered with any local authority', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Only where the agreement is communicated to a third person outside the conspiracy and acted upon in some way', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. {'text': 'Only where some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties in pursuance of the agreement', 'label': 'A'}
1. The proviso to Section 120A IPC carves an exception to the rule that mere agreement is criminal conspiracy.
2. For an agreement that is NOT itself to commit an offence, conspiracy attaches **only when some overt act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties** to the agreement in pursuance of it.
3. Agreements to commit an offence are punishable per se under section 120A even without an overt act — that is the rule the proviso modifies.
4. Writing, number of parties and communication to outsiders are irrelevant to the proviso.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 9 (Indian Penal Code, 1860), pp. 205-224._
Related questions
Sections 82 and 83 IPC deal with the criminal liability of children. Which proposition corSection 84 IPC excludes criminal liability of a person of **unsound mind**. According to LLesson 9 explains the **distinction between libel and slander**. Which statement matches tSection 499 IPC, dealing with defamation, contains ten Exceptions. Which of the following Section 463 IPC defines **forgery**. According to *Ramchandran v. State*, AIR 2010 SC 1922Section 416 IPC punishes **cheating by personation**. Which is the correct rule about the Which proposition correctly states the distinction between **cheating** under section 415 In *Kuriachan Chacko v. State of Kerala*, (2004) 12 SCC 269, the Supreme Court held the ac