Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Penal Code 1860 › The lesson defines **actus reus** as the third e…
The lesson defines **actus reus** as the third essential element of crime. Which formulation matches the textbook definition?
A{'text': 'Such result of voluntary human conduct which law prohibits; the doing of some willed act', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'The mental condition accompanying a willed movement of the body', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Any movement of the body whether voluntary or involuntary that produces injury', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'The motive that drives the accused to bring about a prohibited consequence', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. {'text': 'Such result of voluntary human conduct which law prohibits; the doing of some willed act', 'label': 'A'}
1. Lesson 9 defines *actus reus* as "such result of voluntary human conduct which law prohibits" and adds that an "act is a willed movement of body".
2. The definition therefore captures two ideas — a result the law prohibits AND a willed (voluntary) act bringing it about.
3. The mental condition (option A) describes mens rea, not actus reus. Involuntary movement (option C) cannot be an act. Motive (option D) is distinct from actus reus.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 9 (Indian Penal Code, 1860), pp. 205-224._
Related questions
Sections 82 and 83 IPC deal with the criminal liability of children. Which proposition corSection 84 IPC excludes criminal liability of a person of **unsound mind**. According to LLesson 9 explains the **distinction between libel and slander**. Which statement matches tSection 499 IPC, dealing with defamation, contains ten Exceptions. Which of the following Section 463 IPC defines **forgery**. According to *Ramchandran v. State*, AIR 2010 SC 1922Section 416 IPC punishes **cheating by personation**. Which is the correct rule about the Which proposition correctly states the distinction between **cheating** under section 415 In *Kuriachan Chacko v. State of Kerala*, (2004) 12 SCC 269, the Supreme Court held the ac