Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Sources of Law › An 'absolutely authoritative' precedent differs …
An 'absolutely authoritative' precedent differs from a 'persuasive' precedent in that the absolutely authoritative precedent:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B.
1. Persuasive precedents are not legally binding; judges take them into consideration but are not obliged to follow them.
2. Absolutely authoritative precedents must be followed by the judge whether they agree with them or not.
3. Such precedents have a legal claim to implicit obedience, irrespective of the judge's view.
4. In India, every court is absolutely bound by the decisions of courts superior to itself.
5. So the defining feature of absolutely authoritative precedent is mandatory obedience.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Programme, Paper 1 "Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws", Lesson 1 "Sources of Law" (Nov 2021 edition, pp 2-19)._
Related questions
The 'Grundnorm' or basic/ultimate norm from which all other norms derive their power is a Per Bentham, expository jurisprudence ascertains what the law is. The complementary branchThe word 'jurisprudence' is derived from the Latin word for 'law' and which other word?Roscoe Pound's theory of law is sometimes called the theory of:Which of the following is NOT among the criticisms of Austin's Command Theory listed in thPer Austin's Command Theory, the three essential features of law are:Per Section 1 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Act does NOT affect:Indian Mercantile Law was first codified through which Act, enacted in 1872?