Karl Ernst von Baer's critique of Ernst Haeckel's embryological argument for evolution rested on the observation that:
A{'text': 'Embryos never recapitulate the adult stages of other animal lineages', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Vertebrate embryos do not develop gill-slit-like structures at any stage', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Embryological similarities are produced entirely by convergent evolution', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Embryos of closely related species develop in completely different ways', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. {'text': 'Embryos never recapitulate the adult stages of other animal lineages', 'label': 'A'}
Haeckel argued that shared embryonic features (such as vestigial gill slits in vertebrate embryos) support common descent. Von Baer disagreed, noting that embryos never pass through the adult stages of other animals, so the strict recapitulation reading of embryology is unsupported.
Related questions
Natural selection acts on which type of characteristics?Homo erectus fossils were discovered in 1891 in:Homo habilis had a brain capacity of:Dryopithecus and Ramapithecus existed about how many million years ago?How many factors are known to affect Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?A constant gene pool across generations is called genetic:The sum total of all allelic frequencies in a population is:By 1920, after industrialisation, the more numerous moths were: