Karl Ernst von Baer's critique of Ernst Haeckel's embryological argument for evolution rested on the observation that:
A{'text': 'Embryos never recapitulate the adult stages of other animal lineages', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'Vertebrate embryos do not develop gill-slit-like structures at any stage', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'Embryological similarities are produced entirely by convergent evolution', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'Embryos of closely related species develop in completely different ways', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. {'text': 'Embryos never recapitulate the adult stages of other animal lineages', 'label': 'A'}
Haeckel argued that shared embryonic features (such as vestigial gill slits in vertebrate embryos) support common descent. Von Baer disagreed, noting that embryos never pass through the adult stages of other animals, so the strict recapitulation reading of embryology is unsupported.
Related questions
Homo sapiens (modern humans) first evolved in:Genetic drift is STRONGEST in which type of population?The 14 species of finches that Darwin observed on the Galapagos Islands are a classic examThe shift in peppered moth (Biston betularia) colour during the Industrial Revolution is aThe human APPENDIX is a classic example of a:The wings of insects and the wings of birds are best described as:The Hardy-Weinberg principle's equation for genotype frequencies is:Charles Darwin's mechanism of evolution is best described as: