Article 25 protections do NOT extend to 'essential religious practices' that violate constitutional morality. The leading recent decision is
AMary Roy
BSarla Mudgal
CIndian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala (2018) — the Sabarimala case — where the majority held that the exclusion of women aged 10-50 from the Sabarimala temple violates Articles 14, 15, 17, 25; a 9-judge bench reference is presently pending
DVishaka
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala (2018) — the Sabarimala case — where the majority held that the exclusion of women aged 10-50 from the Sabarimala temple violates Articles 14, 15, 17, 25; a 9-judge bench reference is presently pending
Sabarimala generated significant doctrinal recalibration. The 5-judge majority (Misra CJI, Khanwilkar J, Nariman J, Chandrachud J) struck down the exclusion; Indu Malhotra J dissented. Review petitions led to a 9-judge bench framework reference (currently undecided).
Related questions
Under the Indian Divorce Act 1869, which earlier governed divorce among Indian Christians,In Joseph Shine v Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court struck downSection 13(1)(i-a) Hindu Marriage Act includes 'cruelty' as a ground for divorce. The inteArticle 15(3) of the Constitution empowers the State to makeUnder Section 125 CrPC (now Section 144 BNSS), an order for maintenance can be made againsThe Special Marriage Act 1954 governsIn Mary Roy v State of Kerala (1986), the Supreme Court held thatIn Shayara Bano v Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court held that