Inductive reasoning is generally regarded as 'fallible' because
AIt cannot be expressed in language
BThe conclusion is logically guaranteed by the premises
CNew observations may always undermine the generalisation, so the conclusion is only probable
DThe premises cannot be verified
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. New observations may always undermine the generalisation, so the conclusion is only probable
Inductive arguments are evaluated as strong/weak (not valid/invalid). They draw probabilistic, not necessary, conclusions. Hume's classic 'problem of induction' targets this fallibility.
Related questions
Odd man out: APPLE, MANGO, BANANA, POTATOIn a series 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, ?, the next prime isIf A=1, B=2, C=3, ..., the value of PEN isOdd man out: 9, 16, 24, 36, 49, 64Find next: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, ?Find next term: 8, 27, 64, 125, ?If the code for TEACHER is VGCEJGT, the code for STUDENT will beFind the missing term: 5, 9, 17, 33, 65, ?