Home › CLAT (NLU Prep) › logicalreasoning › logical_reasoning › Inductive reasoning is generally regarded as 'fa…
Inductive reasoning is generally regarded as 'fallible' because
AIt cannot be expressed in language
BThe conclusion is logically guaranteed by the premises
CNew observations may always undermine the generalisation, so the conclusion is only probable
DThe premises cannot be verified
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. New observations may always undermine the generalisation, so the conclusion is only probable
Inductive arguments are evaluated as strong/weak (not valid/invalid). They draw probabilistic, not necessary, conclusions. Hume's classic 'problem of induction' targets this fallibility.
Related questions
Consider: 'Every student in the class scored above average. Therefore, the class average mIn the analogy 'Doctor : Hospital :: Judge : ____', the BEST completion isA speaker argues: 'My opponent claims we should reduce defence spending. So my opponent waConsider: 'No reptiles are warm-blooded. Some snakes are reptiles. Therefore, no snakes arA passage argues that mandatory voting should be introduced because 'democracy means rule Argument: 'God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God.'
This aPremise: Either the doors were locked, or someone heard the alarm. The doors were NOT lockPassage: 'The crime rate fell by 12% the year after the new law was passed. Hence the new