Home › GATE ME › Mechanical Engineering › navierstokes › Re-derive the incompressibility condition: start…
Re-derive the incompressibility condition: starting from $\partial\rho/\partial t + \nabla\cdot(\rho\mathbf{u}) = 0$ with ρ = const, what remains?
A{'text': '$\\rho = \\nabla\\cdot\\mathbf{u}$', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': '$\\nabla\\cdot\\mathbf{u} = 0$', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': '$\\partial\\rho/\\partial t = 0$ only', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': '$\\rho\\mathbf{u} = 0$', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. {'text': '$\\nabla\\cdot\\mathbf{u} = 0$', 'label': 'B'}
With ρ = const: ∂ρ/∂t = 0 and ρ factors out of divergence. We get ρ∇·u = 0, so ∇·u = 0. Incompressible flow has zero velocity divergence.
Related questions
Body force $\mathbf{f}$ in the momentum equation typically represents:The DEVIATORIC STRESS TENSOR $ igma_{ij}^d$ in N-S is the part:The CONSERVATION OF CHEMICAL SPECIES (mass fraction Y_α of species α) gives:The class of LINEAR SECOND-ORDER PDEs (parabolic, elliptic, hyperbolic) appearing in heat Conservation of THERMAL ENERGY in a flowing fluid involves which key terms?Stokes' hypothesis (often invoked in N-S derivation) relates bulk and shear viscosities byThe "substantial derivative" (or material derivative) of a property $\phi$ is:For an INCOMPRESSIBLE Newtonian fluid with constant μ, the Navier-Stokes equation reduces