Home › AP Microeconomics › Economics › Production, Costs and Industry Structure › Implicit costs are described as more subtle than…
Implicit costs are described as more subtle than explicit costs but:
AJust as important
BFar less important
CNever worth counting
DImpossible to define
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Just as important
1. Subtlety is not the same as insignificance.
2. Explicit costs are out-of-pocket costs, that is, actual payments.
3. Implicit costs are more subtle, but just as important.
4. Ignoring them would overstate how well a business is really doing.
5. That is exactly why economic profit includes them.
_Source: OpenStax Principles of Microeconomics for AP(R) Courses 2e (CC BY 4.0), Ch 7 'Production, Costs and Industry Structure', sections 7.1-7.4_
Related questions
Diminishing marginal returns is described as the general concept behind:The reason capital is treated as the fixed input in the short run is that it:Economies of scale become relevant only after a firm has settled its:A firm reporting positive accounting profit could still be making:Accounting profit differs from economic profit because accounting profit leaves out:Breaking total costs into fixed and variable parts provides the basis for calculating:Once a firm has chosen its least costly production technology, it next considers the:The cost of producing a firm's output depends on how much it uses of labour and: