**Critics of expanding robot use in workplaces have argued that automation primarily threatens lower-skilled jobs. However, a recent survey shows that public perception of which jobs robots could plausibly take varies WIDELY — with tour guide (82%) ranking high and surgeon (16%) ranking low — suggesting that perceived complexity, not skill level per se, drives public expectations.** What is the AUTHOR's central argument?
ARobots will replace all human jobs
BAutomation is primarily a threat to skilled jobs
CPublic perception of which jobs robots can do isn't simply about skill level — it varies based on factors like perceived complexity of human judgment involved
DSurgeons should be replaced
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Public perception of which jobs robots can do isn't simply about skill level — it varies based on factors like perceived complexity of human judgment involved
The author challenges the simple 'lower-skill → more replaceable' narrative by pointing to variation that doesn't fit that pattern (tour guides high, surgeons low — both could be considered skilled in different ways). Option B captures this nuance. Options A, C, D miss or contradict the argument.
Related questions
A passage describes a school principal noting that monsoon attendance drops only in classeA passage notes: railway commuters in Mumbai complete journeys faster on weekdays despite A claim states: students' preferences for snacks varied widely depending on the menu categA hypothesis states: a cooling fin on a cricket helmet improves player performance during A short passage explains how a Bengaluru engineer designed a low-cost water filter for vilA passage describes how a Mumbai street vendor uses leftover newspaper and cardboard from **Two arguments about ecosystem diversity:
Text 1 says historical species diversity drive**Some critics argue that posture significantly affects cognition. Researchers O'Brien and