Home › US CMA Part 2 › Financial Management › Financial Management and Securities Markets › How does a revolving credit agreement differ fro…
How does a revolving credit agreement differ from an ordinary line of credit?
AIt is guaranteed and carries an extra fee
BIt is unsecured and carries no interest cost
CIt is secured by the firm's fixed assets only
DIt is arranged for a period of three months
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. It is guaranteed and carries an extra fee
1. A revolving credit agreement is basically a guaranteed line of credit.
2. Because the funds are guaranteed to be available, it carries an extra fee in addition to interest.
3. These agreements are often arranged for a period of two to five years, well beyond the one-year horizon of an ordinary line of credit.
4. Interest still applies, so the option claiming no interest cost misreads what the extra fee buys.
_Source: OpenStax Introduction to Business (CC BY 4.0), Ch 16 "Understanding Financial Management and Securities Markets", section 16.3 Obtaining Short-Term Financing_
Related questions
Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, what do CFOs consider their top priority?How did the NYSE answer the NASDAQ's head start in electronic trading?Under the rules approved in 2012, which falls in the S&P 500 Index trigger the three levelWhat does Regulation FD require of public companies?The Securities Investor Protection Corporation insures each customer's account up to what What is insider trading?What did the 1964 amendment to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 add to the SEC's powersWhat does the Securities Act of 1933 require of a new securities issue?