Practice free →
HomeLLMLawCorporate Law › Under Section 141 Companies Act 2013, a person i…

Under Section 141 Companies Act 2013, a person is DISQUALIFIED from being appointed as auditor of a company if:

Ahe has not completed an MBA from a recognised university (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3))
Bhe is not a member of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3))
Che or his relative or partner holds any security in the company / holding / subsidiary of value > Rs 1 lakh or has any business relationship; or he is in full-time employment elsewhere; or holds more than 20 audits, etc.
Dhe is below the age of forty years at the time of appointment to the office (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)) (cf. Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3))
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. he or his relative or partner holds any security in the company / holding / subsidiary of value > Rs 1 lakh or has any business relationship; or he is in full-time employment elsewhere; or holds more than 20 audits, etc.
1. Section 141(3) Companies Act 2013 lists disqualifications: (a) a body corporate other than an LLP; (b) an officer or employee of the company; (c) a person in the employment of an officer or employee of the company; (d) a person or partner of firm holding appointment as auditor of more than 20 companies (other than OPC, small companies, dormant companies, etc.); (e) a person who has been convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud and 10 years not elapsed; (f) any person whose subsidiary/associate or any other form of entity is engaged on the date of appointment in consulting and specialised services as provided in section 144; (g) a person who, or his relative or partner — (i) is holding any security or interest in the company or its subsidiary/holding/associate; provided that relative may hold security of face value not exceeding Rs 1,00,000; (ii) is indebted to the company in excess of Rs 5 lakh; (iii) has given a guarantee in excess of Rs 1 lakh; (h) a person or firm which has a business relationship with the company. 2. Hence option A is correct. _Source: Companies Act 2013 (Act 18 of 2013), Govt. of India MCA — Companies Act 2013, Section 141(3)_
Solve this in the app — LLM practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions