In the leading case Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., [1897] AC 22, the House of Lords held that:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C.
1. In Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., the House of Lords laid down the foundational principle of CORPORATE PERSONALITY — a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its members, even if one person effectively owns and controls it.
2. Mr Salomon, having incorporated his shoe business with himself, his wife and children as the seven subscribers, was held NOT liable for the company's debts even after liquidation.
3. The principle is codified in Indian law through Section 9 Companies Act 2013 (effect of registration: from date of incorporation, the company shall be a body corporate by the name contained in the MoA, capable of exercising all functions, etc.).
4. The 'corporate veil' may be lifted in exceptional cases (fraud, evasion of statute, etc.).
5. Hence option B is correct.
_Source: Companies Act 2013 (Act 18 of 2013), Govt. of India MCA — Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., [1897] AC 22_
Related questions
Under Section 2(46) and Section 2(87) Companies Act 2013, a 'holding company' is a companySection 271 Companies Act 2013 grounds for winding-up by NCLT do NOT include 'INABILITY TOUnder Section 102 Companies Act 2013, a statement (EXPLANATORY STATEMENT) annexed to the nUnder Section 246 Companies Act 2013 read with Section 339, the NCLT may order LIFTING OF Under Section 134(3)(c) Companies Act 2013, the BOARD'S REPORT shall include 'Extract of tProducer Companies are governed under Chapter XXI-A (Sections 378A-378ZU) inserted into thSection 380 Companies Act 2013 requires every FOREIGN COMPANY conducting business in IndiaSection 230(11) Companies Act 2013 (inserted by 2019 Amendment) deals with TAKEOVER OFFERS