Home › CA Final › financialreporting › transactionpriceallocation › An entity pays a non-refundable upfront fee to a…
An entity pays a non-refundable upfront fee to a retailer-customer to fund modifications the retailer makes to its shelving to accommodate the entity's products. The entity does NOT obtain control of any rights to the customer's shelves. Under Ind AS 115, this payment is:
AA reduction in the transaction price — the entity does not receive a distinct good or service in exchange
BA goodwill-type asset, amortised over the contract term
CAn advance against future purchases by the customer, with no P&L impact
DA purchase of a distinct service (shelving), accounted at its fair value as a marketing expense
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. A reduction in the transaction price — the entity does not receive a distinct good or service in exchange
Para 70 — consideration paid to a customer is a reduction in the transaction price UNLESS the entity receives a distinct good or service from the customer in exchange (at fair value). Here the entity gets no control of any shelving rights, so the ₹1.5 cr payment is not for a distinct good/service — it reduces the transaction price. The reduction is recognised against revenue as goods are transferred.
Related questions
Telco G grants a one-time RETENTION CREDIT of ₹50 to a customer in month 14 of a 24-month Indicators that control of an asset has been transferred to the customer under Ind AS 115 A construction contractor builds a customised office building on the customer's land. UndeA payroll-processing company contracts to provide monthly payroll services for one year. UUnder Ind AS 115's Step 5, an entity satisfies a performance obligation OVER TIME (rather A consultant signs a ₹2 cr fixed-fee contract on 1 April 20X0 with three distinct POs (dueAn entity has Product A (observable SSP ₹50,000), Y+Z bundle (observable SSP ₹50,000) and An entity sells two licences (A and B). SSPs: Licence A = ₹16 lakh, Licence B = ₹20 lakh.