Practice free →
HomeCA Finalfinancialreportingrelatedpartydisclosures › Mr. Atul is an independent director of X Ltd. an…

Mr. Atul is an independent director of X Ltd. and received a sitting fee of ₹2 lakhs per meeting for 5 Board meetings attended in the year. The Accountant of X Ltd. argues that since independent directors are not employees of the company, their fees need not be disclosed under Ind AS 24. The correct treatment is:

ADisclose the fee only if it exceeds 5% of total managerial remuneration
BDisclose the fee under "other related-party transactions" rather than under KMP compensation
CThe Accountant is correct — independent directors are explicitly excluded from the KMP definition
DThe Accountant is incorrect — independent directors qualify as KMP, and the ₹10 lakhs must be disclosed as short-term employee benefits
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. The Accountant is incorrect — independent directors qualify as KMP, and the ₹10 lakhs must be disclosed as short-term employee benefits
Para 9 of Ind AS 24 defines KMP as persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling activities — INCLUDING any director (executive or otherwise). Independent and non-executive directors are within KMP. Sitting fees are short-term employee benefits under Ind AS 19 (payable within 12 months) and must be disclosed under para 17.
Solve this in the app — CA Final practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions